Cit vs ghanshyam huf
WebIn these circumstances the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Ghanshyam (HUF) (Supra) and CIT Rajkot Vs. Govindbhai Mamaiya are not applicable … WebJul 10, 2024 · The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 5. The Ld. counsel for the assessee read the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs.Ghanshyam (HUF) (2009) 182 Taxman 368 (SC) and argued that the amount received by the assessee is under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and not u/s 34 of …
Cit vs ghanshyam huf
Did you know?
WebJul 12, 2024 · In Rama Bai vs CIT, (1990) 181 ITR 400 (SC), dt. 8/11/1989, case of AY 1967-68-69, it is has held that – arrears of interest computed on delayed or enhanced … WebThe said issue has been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ghanshyam HUF 315 ITR 1 held that the interest paid on the excess amount u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, depends upon a claim by the person whose land is acquired, where as interest u/s 34 of Land Acquisition Act is for delay in making payment. Interest ...
WebOn the facts and circumstances of the case, and with due respect to the decision relied by the CIT(A), appellant would like to rely upon the decision of Hon. Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Ghanshyam 4 ITA No.168/PUN/2016, A.Y. 2011-12 (HUF) (2009) 315 ITR-1(SC), dt.16-07-2009, which is logically as well as with reference to the scheme of ... WebManjeet Singh HUF Vs CIT of CWP No 15506 of 2013 dated 14.01.2014, Naresh Kumar Jain and others Vs State of Haryana ... been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court …
WebAggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings before CIT(A) it was contended that the Supreme Court has in CIT vs. Ghanshyam Dass (HUF) [2009] 315 ITR 1 held interest on enhanced compensation to be a part of compensation and therefore the same is exempt u/s. 10(37) of the Act. WebMay 14, 2024 · The assessee’s land was acquired by the Government of Haryana and Land Acquisition Collector had announced award on 16.07.2007 fixing the market value of the …
WebApex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ghanshyam(HUF), 315 ITR 1 (SC) in support of its above contention. The AO dismissed . ITA No.1591/Chd/2024 A.Y. 2010-11 4 the contention of the assessee stating that the issue of taxability of interest on enhanced compensation was now covered by the amended provisions of sections 56(2)(viii), ...
WebMay 19, 2024 · AfterGhanshyam (HUF> [2009] 315 ITR 1 (SC), it was settled thatinterest received on compensation or enhanced compensation under section 28 of Land … how did louie zong do the vocalsWebSep 30, 2024 · It is observed that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v/s Ghanshyam (HUF) 315 ITR 1 has held that interest paid on the excess amount, u/s 28 … how did lou gehrig know he had alsWebThe Ld.CIT(A) has considered all the judgments mentioned in the present grounds of Appeal and since the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Singh & Ors … how many shots with modernaWebMar 18, 2024 · The Ld. AR submitted that Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Ghansyam HUF (supra) held that interest awarded u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is … how many shots were fired at daunte wrightWebIn CIT Ghanshyam (HUF) [2009] 8 SCC 412, Interest earned under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act,which is on enhanced compensation, ... Following its earlier decision in Ghanshyam (HUF), the Supreme Court held that the interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on the enhanced income was to be taxed in the year ... how did louis armstrong achieve fameWebAug 11, 2015 · [ITO vs. Amarlal (2007) 14 SOT 239 (Del-Trib)] Interest received on delayed payment of compensation is determined and taxable under the head income from other sources on year to year basis. [CIT v Ghanshyam (HUF) (2009) 315 ITR 1 (SC)]. how many shots were fired at jfkWebCIT Vs Ghanshyam (HUF) 5. Bharat Earth Movers Vs CIT (2000) 245 ITR 428 (SC) 1. Grace Collis and others Vs CIT (2001) 248 ITR 323 (SC) 2. CIT Vs Madras Auto Services Ltd. (1998) 233 ITR 468 SC 3. CIT Vs National … how did lou gehrig use pathos in his speech